You are about to make a big technology decision
Software, cloud, AI, data, vendors, platforms, build vs buy, or architecture.
CTO Review and architecture advice for software, platform, cloud, AI, data and vendor decisions before cost, delay or lock-in compounds.
When a technology decision is big enough to affect money, risk, pace or confidence, but you do not need a full-time CTO.
Software, cloud, AI, data, vendors, platforms, build vs buy, or architecture.
The goal is clear, but the path, sequencing, technical approach or next step is not.
An outside view before cost, delay or lock-in becomes hard to unwind.
Independent advice across strategy, architecture, vendors, AI, automation and early-stage product direction.
Send a short overview of the decision, project, vendor, platform or problem you want reviewed.
I’ll help clarify what needs attention, what type of support makes sense, and whether I’m the right fit.
We begin with the highest-risk or highest-value decision first.
Innovate Design Build is a Canberra-based technology advisory and architecture consultancy led by Tony Wybrow.
Tony was formerly Lead Solution Architect at CSIRO, where for four years he advised senior technology leaders and led architecture across complex cloud, data, security, infrastructure and research technology environments.
With 15+ years of experience across cloud, data, security, infrastructure and architecture, Tony helps founders, SMEs, research teams and complex organisations make better technology decisions before they commit serious money, sign vendors, rebuild platforms or scale technical teams.
He works as a fractional CTO, independent technical advisor and architecture reviewer for organisations that need senior technology judgement without hiring a full-time CTO.
A few answers before you decide whether it is worth a conversation.
START A CONVERSATIONNo. It is enough to explain the decision, concern or opportunity. Part of the work is clarifying what actually needs to be reviewed.
A fractional CTO provides senior technology strategy and direction without becoming a full-time executive. That can include architecture, vendor review, roadmap advice, risk review and delivery oversight.
No. The role is independent technical judgement, review and direction. I can work with your existing people or help you challenge assumptions before committing further.
Not as the main offer. Selected hands-on support is possible where useful, but the core value is architecture, review and senior decision support.
Yes. Especially where the risk is hype, unclear value, poor data assumptions, vendor lock-in or hidden implementation cost.
Yes. Vendor proposals, platform choices, architecture assumptions and implementation plans are exactly the kind of decisions worth reviewing before money is committed.
No. This can suit SMEs, founders, research teams, government-adjacent projects and organisations making serious technology decisions.
Yes. The work can sit above an existing team, developer or vendor by providing direction, review, prioritisation and an independent second opinion.
You either get a scoped next step, or I tell you if it is not the right fit. The aim is clarity, not pressure.
No. The first step can be a focused review or advisory engagement. A retainer only makes sense if ongoing guidance is genuinely useful.
Use the form to request a free consultation or discuss a technology decision that needs independent senior judgement.